<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defining Manhood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lionelwoods.net/2010/06/defining-manhood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lionelwoods.net/2010/06/defining-manhood/</link>
	<description>the weblog of Lionel Woods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 10:33:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aussiejohn</title>
		<link>http://www.lionelwoods.net/2010/06/defining-manhood/comment-page-1/#comment-1886</link>
		<dc:creator>Aussiejohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 21:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lionelwoods.net/?p=448#comment-1886</guid>
		<description>Lionel,

I was going to add, apart from His Deity, He is everything I would hope to be, but cannot be in this earthly life because I am a saint who sins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lionel,</p>
<p>I was going to add, apart from His Deity, He is everything I would hope to be, but cannot be in this earthly life because I am a saint who sins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aussiejohn</title>
		<link>http://www.lionelwoods.net/2010/06/defining-manhood/comment-page-1/#comment-1885</link>
		<dc:creator>Aussiejohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 21:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lionelwoods.net/?p=448#comment-1885</guid>
		<description>Lionel,

Briefly: He is the epitomy of:

Compassion towards all, Obedience to the Father, Surrendered to the Father&#039;s rule, Absolute example of being Spirit Filled, Prayerful, Humble,  a true Servant, utter Confidence in the Father.

He is:

Powerful but gentle, just and compassionate, lived in reality,not fantasy, as a man,fully aware of human weakness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lionel,</p>
<p>Briefly: He is the epitomy of:</p>
<p>Compassion towards all, Obedience to the Father, Surrendered to the Father&#8217;s rule, Absolute example of being Spirit Filled, Prayerful, Humble,  a true Servant, utter Confidence in the Father.</p>
<p>He is:</p>
<p>Powerful but gentle, just and compassionate, lived in reality,not fantasy, as a man,fully aware of human weakness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lionel Woods</title>
		<link>http://www.lionelwoods.net/2010/06/defining-manhood/comment-page-1/#comment-1880</link>
		<dc:creator>Lionel Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lionelwoods.net/?p=448#comment-1880</guid>
		<description>Vetta,

What do 4 and 5 look like practically?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vetta,</p>
<p>What do 4 and 5 look like practically?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lionel Woods</title>
		<link>http://www.lionelwoods.net/2010/06/defining-manhood/comment-page-1/#comment-1879</link>
		<dc:creator>Lionel Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lionelwoods.net/?p=448#comment-1879</guid>
		<description>Aussie,

What does that look like practically? The life and practices of Christ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aussie,</p>
<p>What does that look like practically? The life and practices of Christ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Paden</title>
		<link>http://www.lionelwoods.net/2010/06/defining-manhood/comment-page-1/#comment-1876</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Paden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lionelwoods.net/?p=448#comment-1876</guid>
		<description>Aussiejohn,

Amen to that brother!  For Christ is the perfect man and therefore our perfect example of what it is to be a man.  Study Him and you will find all of your manhood points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aussiejohn,</p>
<p>Amen to that brother!  For Christ is the perfect man and therefore our perfect example of what it is to be a man.  Study Him and you will find all of your manhood points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aussiejohn</title>
		<link>http://www.lionelwoods.net/2010/06/defining-manhood/comment-page-1/#comment-1875</link>
		<dc:creator>Aussiejohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 20:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lionelwoods.net/?p=448#comment-1875</guid>
		<description>Lionel,

Human manhood can be described in one word, whether secular or Christian: JESUS CHRIST!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lionel,</p>
<p>Human manhood can be described in one word, whether secular or Christian: JESUS CHRIST!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hutch</title>
		<link>http://www.lionelwoods.net/2010/06/defining-manhood/comment-page-1/#comment-1863</link>
		<dc:creator>Hutch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 21:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lionelwoods.net/?p=448#comment-1863</guid>
		<description>In the Christian marriage, I think we make a mistake on focusing on the differences or so called roles instead of focussing on the one-flesh relationship that I believe is so much more than just sexual union as we grow more and more as a one-flesh couple in Christ as our marriages picture the relationship of Christ and the church. Like Priscilla and Aquilla, our identities become more and more intertwined with each other as we walk in Christ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Christian marriage, I think we make a mistake on focusing on the differences or so called roles instead of focussing on the one-flesh relationship that I believe is so much more than just sexual union as we grow more and more as a one-flesh couple in Christ as our marriages picture the relationship of Christ and the church. Like Priscilla and Aquilla, our identities become more and more intertwined with each other as we walk in Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javetta</title>
		<link>http://www.lionelwoods.net/2010/06/defining-manhood/comment-page-1/#comment-1862</link>
		<dc:creator>Javetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lionelwoods.net/?p=448#comment-1862</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...let&#039;s see...in no particular order (and some of these are not exclusively male but in my opinion are important in defining manhood)

1. Born with male genitalia.

2. Provider (not necessarily in the traditional way...I just mean he must contributing to the household in some way whether it be a stay at home dad or an outside job).

3. Humility

4. Protector of the family

5. Leader of the family

6. Patience

7. Willing to sacrifice for the family

8. Love for Christ

9. Love for the Church

10. Love for his family

I get some of these principles from society, personal preference, tradition, or my faith.....Who should define them? In a marriage, the husband and wife should define these. In singlehood, I think each individual should define them and link with a mate who shares the same convictions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;let&#8217;s see&#8230;in no particular order (and some of these are not exclusively male but in my opinion are important in defining manhood)</p>
<p>1. Born with male genitalia.</p>
<p>2. Provider (not necessarily in the traditional way&#8230;I just mean he must contributing to the household in some way whether it be a stay at home dad or an outside job).</p>
<p>3. Humility</p>
<p>4. Protector of the family</p>
<p>5. Leader of the family</p>
<p>6. Patience</p>
<p>7. Willing to sacrifice for the family</p>
<p>8. Love for Christ</p>
<p>9. Love for the Church</p>
<p>10. Love for his family</p>
<p>I get some of these principles from society, personal preference, tradition, or my faith&#8230;..Who should define them? In a marriage, the husband and wife should define these. In singlehood, I think each individual should define them and link with a mate who shares the same convictions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hutch</title>
		<link>http://www.lionelwoods.net/2010/06/defining-manhood/comment-page-1/#comment-1860</link>
		<dc:creator>Hutch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lionelwoods.net/?p=448#comment-1860</guid>
		<description>More testosterone than estrogen and the right equipment? I&#039;m not good at this, ask Wayne Grudem. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More testosterone than estrogen and the right equipment? I&#8217;m not good at this, ask Wayne Grudem. <img src='http://www.lionelwoods.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lionel Woods</title>
		<link>http://www.lionelwoods.net/2010/06/defining-manhood/comment-page-1/#comment-1859</link>
		<dc:creator>Lionel Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lionelwoods.net/?p=448#comment-1859</guid>
		<description>Hutch,

I would take all non Chritian perspectives also. So it doesn&#039;t have to say &quot;what makes a Christian man&quot; but a man in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hutch,</p>
<p>I would take all non Chritian perspectives also. So it doesn&#8217;t have to say &#8220;what makes a Christian man&#8221; but a man in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

